We now know that Dr. Bhattacharya and the opposite GBD authors had been right
Smart Drugs is a monetized Substack that publishes anti-vaccine nonsense and pro-RFK Jr. propaganda. A current article there by Dr. Edward Livingston reveals a typical approach misinformation medical doctors use to trick their readers and rewrite the historical past of the pandemic: censorship.
Dr. Livingston’s article was titled The Semmelweis Impact and The Nice Barrington Declaration, and it mentioned:
Regardless of the wealthy historical past of the risks of rejecting new or alternate concepts about illness, the medical institution has not discovered its lesson. With COVID, the Semmelweis Impact was in full power. This time, it was the GBD authors who had been the witches burned on the stake.
Jay Bhattacharya, who authored the declaration with Dr. Martin Kulldorff and Dr. Sunetra Gupta, is the face of the GBD and a modern-day Semmelweis. Bhattacharya and his colleagues issued the Nice Barrington Declaration on October 4, 2020, the pandemic was raging and the response to it was chaotic, calling for a reasoned method to COVID…
We now know that Dr. Bhattacharya and the opposite GBD authors had been right, and the specialists had been very mistaken. The Semmelweis Impact. Going ahead, specialists must be cautious earlier than discrediting new concepts. The extra passionate the specialists are about countering one thing, the extra skeptical the general public shall be in regards to the specialists.
Although Dr. Livingston claimed “Dr. Bhattacharya and the opposite GBD authors had been right” he didn’t quote them in any respect.
We at SBM reject censorship. As such, our readers know that the GBD sought to unfold a lethal an infection with tragic penalties. Its authors weren’t “the witches burned on the stake,” as Dr. Livingston histrionically claimed. Moderately they the place sheltered laptop computer class medical doctors who drastically underestimated COVID, however had been nonetheless rewarded with energy and fame. In distinction, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis tried to avoid wasting lives by limiting a lethal an infection (although germ principle was not but identified). His advocacy for hand washing was rejected, and he tragically died in a psychological hospital. Semmelweis and the GBD are mirror opposites in each means.
Immediately, Semmelweis features because the medical model of the Galileo gambit. Dr. Livingston’s core argument was that as a result of the medical established rejected Semmelweis in 1847, the GBD was “right” about COVID in 2020. Nonetheless, Dr. Livingston can solely make this declare by censoring what the GBD really mentioned.
As immunity builds within the inhabitants, the chance of an infection to all – together with the susceptible – falls.
As a result of I respect my readers and don’t cover data to deceive them, right here’s the core premise of the GBD, taken from the GBD itself:
As immunity builds within the inhabitants, the chance of an infection to all – together with the susceptible – falls. We all know that every one populations will finally attain herd immunity – i.e. the purpose at which the speed of recent infections is steady – and that this may be assisted by (however just isn’t dependent upon) a vaccine. Our aim ought to due to this fact be to reduce mortality and social hurt till we attain herd immunity.
Probably the most compassionate method that balances the dangers and advantages of reaching herd immunity, is to permit those that are at minimal threat of demise to dwell their lives usually to construct up immunity to the virus by means of pure an infection, whereas higher defending those that are at highest threat. We name this Centered Safety…
People who find themselves extra in danger might take part if they need, whereas society as a complete enjoys the safety conferred upon the susceptible by those that have constructed up herd immunity.
The GBD additional claimed that this mass an infection of unvaccinated individuals would result in herd immunity in beneath 6 months. They mentioned:
For a way lengthy should high-risk people watch out and/or self-isolate?
When herd immunity is reached, they will dwell usually once more with minimal dangers. How lengthy that takes relies on the technique used. If age-wide lockdown measures are used to try to suppress the illness, it may take a yr or two or three, making it very tough for older individuals to guard themselves for that lengthy. If centered safety is used, it would probably solely take 3 to six months.
In articles, interviews, and on social media the authors of the GBD spoke continually about pure immunity resulting in herd immunity the primary 1.5 years of the pandemic. This was what it was all about.
I didn’t censor something
But, Dr. Livingston didn’t point out this in any respect. He intentionally hid what the GBD proposed as a result of he doesn’t respect Smart Drugs readers or belief them with the reality. His article was only one small instance of pandemic revisionism by which misinformation medical doctors search to erase the truth of the We Need Them Contaminated motion and exchange it with a fantasy the place pro-infection medical doctors solely cared about poor youngsters and the working class.
On social media, Dr. Livingston absurdly protested “I didn’t censor something.” So right here’s my problem to him and anybody else who claims the GBD was correct- write a protection of the GBD that features the passages on this article.
Everyone knows that may by no means occur.